What Does h4831sc Mean?
What Does h4831sc Mean?
Blog Article
This really is designed to be the "drop by" powder-or darn close to it- for almost any bottle-necked cartridge just one could handload. It truly is the muse for lots of pet loads, yet I have never been happy with the outcomes.
Ballistically, Hodgdon H4831 SC Powder is the exact duplicate of H4831. Bodily, it's got a shorter grain measurement, therefore, the designation SC or short cut. The shorter, more compact kernels enable the powder to move from the powder steps extra efficiently, helping to alleviate the constant chopping of granules.
What is actually the main difference? Compression. Without the Excessive/heavy compression linked to the long grain 7828, the strain curve was altered as well as load fell apart.
Sweet!! I will pick some up and give it a try. Thanks fellas, I take pleasure in it! I will Allow you to know very well what I uncover. I do have a few 50 percent pound of 4350 I'm able to try out that very first and see what takes place.
Yup or it is not going to do the job well. And Because the OP has a load making use of Varget I'd attempt to discover an individual to trade with. Could think of a earn gain predicament.
Given that there isn't going to look like any "Formal" Load Data on the market for this Load, can many of you deliver a place to begin with this mix and factors to consider when Doing the job this Load up?
Any person loading 7mm Rem Mag with H4831sc? How are the results, any data you can share? Also needs to mention I've some ELD-X 175's I would want to take a look at out, In case you have information on that as well.
excaliber stated: I have identified the precise opposite to be genuine in my gun. H4831SC was the slowest powder with 180 g Accubonds. RL22 was a considerably quicker and equally exact powder in my 300 Earn Mag.
With the quick Minimize Model powder comes up to The bottom of the reduce shoulder so I even h4831 vs h4831sc now have numerous home.
Why would I mention this? What precisely is my place? I'm undecided that there's a genuine legitimate position apart from what is preferred with most has not been well-liked with me in the slightest degree in these circumstances. Do I just Have got a powder jinx or anything? Just to teach you how nuts I actually am, tomorrow I am vary screening a friends new .
This is certainly an more mature thread, you may not get a reaction, and h4831sc load data could be reviving an old thread. Please contemplate creating a new thread.
Right after looking through this post (and plenty of Other folks, but this one particular is among the most data driven with numerous accredited h4831 vs h4831sc shooters) I have stopped stressing about touching or currently being in a magical distance from the lands, and began loading wherever I could enhance several elements of a load. Just my .02, hopefully you can find a thing to work for ya.
Each provide the Same burn off level, quick Minimize is available in handy For anyone who is at max fill and not at stress/velocity that you might want you will get far more shortcut in a situation.
I sawed one in half to see how thick the jackets were being, they usually ended up simply twice as thick as being a fifty-grain hollow place was. Ditto to the 64-grain Power Issue, as these bullets are designed for deer, not prairie puppies or woodchucks. You now know every little thing I know about the 22-250 and gradual-burning powders, and I don't know something at all with regard to the 223. I doubt that you're going to get any place with that cartridge and 4831, but allow us to know the way it goes.